Wednesday, August 26, 2020

Ancestry of Oprah Winfrey

Heritage of Oprah Winfrey Oprah Gail Winfrey was conceived in 1954 in rustic Mississippi, the offspring of a relationship between Vernon Winfrey and Vernita Lee. Her folks never wedded, and Oprah spent quite a bit of her childhood being moved between different family members. From her pained adolescence, Oprah Winfrey has developed into a commonly recognized name, making progress as an anchor person, on-screen character, maker, distributer, and dissident. Tips for Reading This Family Tree Original: 1. Oprah Gail WINFREY was conceived on 29 Jan 1954 on in the humble community of Kosciusko, Attala County, Mississippi to Vernon WINFREY and Vernita LEE. Not long after her introduction to the world, her mom Vernita moved north to Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and youthful Oprah was left under the watchful eye of her maternal grandma, Hattie Mae Lee. At age six, Oprah left Mississippi to join her mom in Milwaukee. Following a few upsetting, disregarded a very long time with her mom and half-kin, Oprah moved again at 14 years old to join her dad in Nashville, Tennessee. Second Generation (Parents): 2. Vernon WINFREY was conceived in 1933 in Mississippi. 3. Vernita LEE was conceived in 1935 in Mississippi. Vernon WINFREY and Vernita LEE were rarely hitched and their lone youngster was Oprah Winfrey: 1 I. Oprah Gail WINFREY Third Generation (Grandparents): 4. Elmore E. WINFREY was brought into the world 12 March 1901 in Poplar Creek, Montgomery County, Michigan and kicked the bucket on 15 October 1988 in Kosciusko, Attala County, Mississippi 5. Beatrice WOODS was conceived on 18 February 1902 in Kosciusko, Attala County, Mississippi and passed on 1 December 1999 in Jackson, Hinds County, Mississippi. Elmore WINFREY and Beatrice WOODS wedded on 10 June 1925 in Carroll County, Mississippi, and they had the accompanying kids: I. Lee W. WINFREYii. Brister WINFREYiii. Marie WINFREY2. iv. Vernon WINFREY 6. Earlist LEE was brought into the world about June 1892 in Mississippi and passed on in 1959 in Kosciusko, Attala County, Mississippi. 7. Hattie Mae PRESLEY was brought into the world about April 1900 in Kosciusko, Attala County, Mississippi and passed on 27 Feb 1963 in Kosciusko, Attala County, Mississippi. Earlist LEE and Hattie Mae PRESLEY were hitched around 1918 and had the accompanying kids: I. Susie LEE was brought into the world about 1920.ii. Hal LEE was brought into the world about 1922.iii. Willis S. LEE was brought into the world about 1925.iv. Hubert LEE was brought into the world about 1928.3. v. Vernita LEE

Saturday, August 22, 2020

How to Calculate Backgammon Probabilities

The most effective method to Calculate Backgammon Probabilities Backgammon is a game that utilizes the utilization of two standard dice.â The shakers utilized in this game are six-sided blocks, and the essences of a kick the bucket have one, two, three, four, five or six pips. During a turn in backgammon a player may move their checkers or drafts as indicated by the numbers appeared on the shakers. The numbers rolled can be part between two checkers, or they can be totaled and utilized for a solitary checker. For instance, when a 4 and a 5 are rolled, a player has two choices: he may move one checker four spaces and another five spaces, or one checker can be moved a sum of nine spaces. To define systems in backgammon it is useful to know some essential probabilities. Since a player can utilize a couple of shakers to move a specific checker, any computation of probabilities will remember this. For our backgammon probabilities, we will address the inquiry, â€Å"When we move two shakers, what is the likelihood of rolling the number n as either an aggregate of two bones, or on at any rate one of the two dice?† Count of the Probabilities For a solitary kick the bucket that isn't stacked, each side is similarly prone to land face up. A solitary pass on structures a uniform example space. There are an aggregate of six results, comparing to every one of the numbers from 1 to 6. Hence each number has a likelihood of 1/6 of happening. At the point when we move two shakers, each pass on is free of the other. On the off chance that we maintain track of the control of what number happens on every one of the shakers, at that point there are a sum of 6 x 6 36 similarly likely results. Accordingly 36 is the denominator for the entirety of our probabilities and a specific result of two bones has a likelihood of 1/36. Moving At Least One of a Number The likelihood of moving two bones and getting at any rate one of a number from 1 to 6 is clear to compute. On the off chance that we wish to decide the likelihood of moving at any rate one 2 with two bones, we have to know what number of the 36 potential results incorporate in any event one 2. The methods of doing this are: (1, 2), (2, 2), (3, 2), (4, 2), (5, 2), (6, 2), (2, 1), (2, 3), (2, 4), (2, 5), (2, 6) In this way there are 11 different ways to move in any event one 2 with two shakers, and the likelihood of moving in any event one 2 with two bones is 11/36. There is nothing exceptional around 2 in the first conversation. For some random number n from 1 to 6: There are five different ways to roll precisely one of that number on the first die.There are five different ways to roll precisely one of that number on the second die.There is one approach to roll that number on both bones. Thusly there are 11 different ways to move in any event one n from 1 to 6 utilizing two shakers. The likelihood of this happening is 11/36. Rolling a Particular Sum Any number from two to 12 can be gotten as the entirety of two bones. The probabilities for two shakers are marginally progressively hard to ascertain. Since there are various approaches to arrive at these aggregates, they don't shape a uniform example space. For example, there are three different ways to roll an aggregate of four: (1, 3), (2, 2), (3, 1), however just two different ways to roll a whole of 11: (5, 6), (6, 5). The likelihood of rolling a whole of a specific number is as per the following: The likelihood of rolling a total of two is 1/36.The likelihood of rolling a total of three is 2/36.The likelihood of rolling a whole of four is 3/36.The likelihood of rolling a total of five is 4/36.The likelihood of rolling an entirety of six is 5/36.The likelihood of rolling a total of seven is 6/36.The likelihood of rolling an aggregate of eight is 5/36.The likelihood of rolling a total of nine is 4/36.The likelihood of rolling a total of ten is 3/36.The likelihood of rolling a total of eleven is 2/36.The likelihood of rolling a total of twelve is 1/36. Backgammon Probabilities Finally we have all that we have to compute probabilities for backgammon. Moving in any event one of a number is fundamentally unrelated from moving this number as an aggregate of two shakers. Hence we can utilize the option rule to include the probabilities together for acquiring any number from 2 to 6. For instance, the likelihood of moving in any event one 6 out of two bones is 11/36. Rolling a 6 as an entirety of two shakers is 5/36. The likelihood of moving in any event one 6 or rolling a six as an aggregate of two shakers is 11/36 5/36 16/36. Different probabilities can be determined along these lines.

Wednesday, August 19, 2020

An Overview of Disorganized Schizophrenia

An Overview of Disorganized Schizophrenia February 03, 2020 Schizophrenia Overview Symptoms & Diagnosis Causes & Risk Factors Treatment Living With In Children Verywell / Evan Polenghi In This Article Table of Contents Expand Diagnosis Symptoms Onset Causes and Risk Factors Treatment Complications Overall, the lifetime prevalence of schizophrenia is 0.3 to 0.7 percent, and it is a lifelong disorder that can lead to severe impairments in functioning. Disorganized schizophrenia, also referred to as hebephrenic schizophrenia, based on the Greek term for adolescence, was a subtype of schizophrenia previously recognized in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). In the current version of the DSM (DSM-5, released in 2013), there are no longer subtypes of schizophrenia (previously there was the disorganized type, as well as paranoid, catatonic, undifferentiated, and residual types), as it was determined that these were not helpful to clinicians when treating the disorder. However, disorganized symptoms remain one criterion for diagnosing schizophrenia, and some individuals may show more of these types of symptoms than other symptoms of the disorder. In the most general sense, disorganized schizophrenia refers to disorganization of thought processes, behavior, and affect regulation (emotions). Diagnosis Diagnosis of schizophrenia involves a comprehensive set of examinations to rule out other causes of symptoms, including a physical exam, blood count, thyroid assessment, drug and alcohol use assessment, and possibly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT scans for brain lesions or other abnormalities. In addition, a psychological evaluation will be conducted to determine the thoughts, feelings, behavior patterns, family history, and medical history of a patient presenting with symptoms that suggest schizophrenia. Diagnosis is made according to the DSM-5 criteria, which are as follows: A person must present with two or more of the following (at least one of them must be from the first three on the list) for a significant portion of the time over a 1-month period: DelusionsHallucinationsDisorganized speechGrossly disorganized or catatonic behaviorNegative symptoms In addition, the person must show impairment in life functioning, and continuous signs of the disturbance for a period of at least 6 months. Disorganized Symptoms What are the disorganized symptoms in schizophrenia? Simply put, they fall into the third and fourth categories of symptoms listed in the DSM-5 for diagnosing the disorder. A person who is experiencing disorganized schizophrenia may show any of the following symptoms: Problems with routine tasks like dressing, bathing, brushing teethShowing emotions that are not appropriate to the situationBlunted or flat affectImpaired communication ability, including speechProblems with the use and ordering of wordsAn inability to think clearly and respond appropriatelyUse of nonsense words/making up words (neologism)Shifting quickly from one thought to the next without logical connectionsWriting a lot without any meaningForgetting or losing thingsPacing or walking in circlesHaving problems understanding everyday thingsResponding to questions with unrelated answersRepeating the same things over and over againProblems with attaining goals or completing tasksLack of impulse controlFailure to make eye contactChildlike behaviorsSocial withdrawal It is easy to see that the disorganized symptoms of schizophrenia cover a range of issues related to thoughts, speech, behavior, and emotion. Unfortunately, these symptoms interfere with the ability to function both in terms of activities of daily living and communication with others. Onset The peak age of onset of schizophrenia is in the early to mid-20s for men and late 20s for women. Schizophrenia is most commonly diagnosed from adolescence to early adulthood. Because the onset of disorganized symptoms is often gradual and may be attributed to other problems experienced during this time of life, such as trying to adjust to adulthood, the signs of disorganization due to schizophrenia are not always easy to spot. Unfortunately, the prognosis is worse both when schizophrenia begins earlier, and also when treatment is begun later. Causes and Risk Factors We dont know precisely what causes schizophrenia; however, it is believed to result from a combination of biological and environmental factors related to faulty signaling between brain cells and different neurotransmitter systems. In addition, each of the following risk factors has been implicated in the development of the disorder: A family history of schizophreniaA viral infection as a fetus during pregnancy (e.g., influenza, herpes, toxoplasmosis, rubella)Malnutrition as a fetus during pregnancyExperiencing severe stress during your early lifeBeing born to older parentsUsing recreational drugs during adolescence (though this could also be a result of having schizophrenia) Having one or more of these risk factors does not mean that you will necessarily develop schizophrenia. However, showing symptoms of the disorder along with one or more of these risk factors could be a sign that you should be assessed by your doctor to determine whether you meet criteria for a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Risk Factors for Schizophrenia Treatment Much like other mental health disorders, the primary treatments for schizophrenia are medication and psychotherapy. As mentioned earlier, earlier diagnosis and treatment mean better outcomes, particularly in the case of disorganized symptoms, because these can have a significant impact on things such as completing education, finding a job, and living independently. Schizophrenia Discussion Guide Get our printable guide to help you ask the right questions at your next doctors appointment. Download PDF Medication Medications for schizophrenia include antipsychotic drugs. In severe cases, a person diagnosed with schizophrenia may need to be hospitalized for stabilization or safety. Medications for the disorder will help to reduce disordered thinking and improve functioning. Some people may also be prescribed antidepressants, mood stabilizers, or anti-anxiety medication alongside antipsychotics for symptoms of schizophrenia. Therapy Talk therapy such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) can be used in schizophrenia to target specific life problems and to help you develop coping strategies to deal with those problems. Learning to regulate emotions by examining thought processes is one helpful strategy that can be developed through CBT. Find Support With the 9 Best Online Therapy Programs Electro-Convulsive Therapy (ECT) ECT involves sending an electric current through the brain to provoke a neurochemical release, and may be helpful in those who are also experiencing a risk of suicide or severe depression. Skills Training Skills training for people with disorganized schizophrenia might be used to help you find a job, further your education, or learn how to better communicate with others despite your symptoms. Family Support While not a treatment per se, support from family plays a large role in how well those with schizophrenia will fare. Your family needs to learn about and understand the disorder, as well as learn how best to support you. Complications As with other mental health conditions, there are numerous complications of living with disorganized schizophrenia. Below is a list of just some of the issues that can come with having a diagnosis of this disorder: DepressionRisk of suicideMalnutritionPoor personal hygieneSubstance use to self-medicateUnemploymentPovertyHomelessnessFamily conflictLower educational attainmentInvolvement in crime (potentially as either victim, perpetrator, or both)Poor living conditions (e.g., the inability to keep up with housework)Poor medication compliance Unfortunately, many people with this disorder feel that they dont need medications or can stop taking their medication once their symptoms start to resolve. Disorganized schizophrenia is a lifelong ailment that requires ongoing treatment, and it will return without medication. If you are a person living with schizophrenia, it is important to follow the advice of your doctor regardless of how well you may be feeling. In addition, if you are a family member of someone with schizophrenia, be sure to check on them often and become aware of the signs and symptoms of the disorder that could return if medication is stopped. A Word From Verywell Disorganized schizophrenia involves impairment in daily activities and communication with others. If you suspect that you or someone you know may be living with the symptoms of this disorder, it is important to make an appointment with your doctor for an assessment and diagnosis. Early detection and treatment mean a better prognosis, particularly when a person is living with disorganized thoughts, behaviors, and emotions. Proper treatment in the form of medication and/or therapy is necessary; without treatment from a professional, it is unlikely that the symptoms that are being experienced will go away on their own. What Its Like to Have Schizophrenia

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

Political Globalization Argumentative Essay Examples

Introduction Political globalization is an increasing trend towards multilateralism. It involves an emerging transnational state apparatus and the emergence of national and international nongovernmental organizations that act as watchdogs over governments have increased their activities and influence. (Moghadam, 2005). The Arizona Immigration Bill left a lot to be desired. The legislatures who drafted the bill argue it out that they had the interest of the country at heart. In real sense there are a lot of issues which remained unearthed and the immigrants were to suffer a lot. The immigrants’ rights were breached and their freedom also taken away from them. The Bill was to offer much benefit to the private prison company bearing in mind the amount of money that they intended to raise from the prisoners. Their main aim was actually to keep the prisons full for years with illegal immigrants and they didn’t have any doubt that this one was to be achieved. The process of locking people alleged to be illegal immigrants shows a lot of breach on the fundamental human freedom as the police can lock up anyone who cannot show nay proof that they entered the country legally. To some extent it would help curb the aliens but at the same time it could be disastrous as the police can take advantage of this directive and round up anybody and get him/her locked into the cells. Bearing in mind what took place behind the scenes that saw the bill drafted, it is clear it was not done as a result of good will and the state’s interest was not put first. The main beneficiaries which were the private prisons influenced the whole process. This clearly indicates that the bill could also be having several loopholes which if not looked into critically, can bring the state to its knees. However, the Bill could be as good as Grand Hyatt said, but considering the circumstances behind is drafting, we can no longer trust it as it put the interest of the private prisons first who are charged with the responsibilities of locking up prisoners. It is a fact that the illegal immigrants have negative effects to the development of a country and they should never be encouraged. The presence of illegal immigrants result into loss of revenue as the government cannot properly plan for the population within its jurisdiction. At the same time, most illegal immigrants evade paying of taxes as there is no proper documentation of their whereabouts. Due to this fact, the illegal immigrants should be discouraged from being in a country through all means possible. Illegal immigrants pose security threats to a country as should not be given a chance to intermingle with the genuine citizens of a state. This is so in order to avoid innocent citizens being intoxicated with the wayward ideas of the illegal immigrants. By having them locked in the Prisons as the Bill demands, the state’s interest is put first and monitoring security situation in the state becomes easy. This also helps in reducing cases of drug trafficking. The main architect behind the drafting of the Arizona Bill, is a professional and sits in the American Legislative Executive Council. However, his credibility is questionable as he tends to be biased in order to benefit other players in the field. He argues openly that there is a lot of revenue that the country can get from the illegal immigrants and he has no doubt that the prisons will be filled with illegal immigrants. This leaves a lot to be desired as the main beneficiary from this is not the government but the private prisons. It emerges clearly from this that the main architect behind the drafting of this bill have shares in the prison industry and want to gain in one way or the other. The author tried to employ the use of propaganda in order to make the whole process of having the bill in place look like it had good intentions. He portrays the illegal immigrants as enemies of a state in terms of economy, security and moral decadence. He goes a head to justify the claims by discussing how much the state loses through unpaid taxes. The claims are true and can easily convince the reader through the facts presented therein. The information presented is distorted in some way. This is due to the fact that the author wanted the illegal immigrants to be paying some daily fee. He also goes ahead to state that he has no doubt that the prisons will be filled with illegal immigrants. He is biased during the drafting of the bill and it is clear that he did not break the information in the house but decided to do it in a hotel. This clearly shows that he was trying to evade some scrutiny from the house and he was only confident to present the report to the house after garnering enough support from the members of the house and being backed up by the business community. The analogies presented here are not faulty as the author is armed with facts when comparing a state that has laws put in place to curb illegal immigrants. He states that unless the Government puts down laws that control the entry of illegal immigrants, then the state is likely to be faced with major problems in the future. The author has oversimplifying the issue of the Arizona Bill on illegal immigrants. He simply states that illegal immigrants are bad and doesn’t give a remedy of curbing their entry. He only tells us on what should be done once they are found to be in the country illegally. The author is trying to stereotype and generalize the whole situation. He proposes for the police to lock up anyone who can not show proof for entering the country legally. He doesn’t advise for measures to be taken and find out the circumstances that may be behind a person being in a country illegally. This issue of generalizing and making assumptions that anyone not having a proof of being in a country legally is an alien can see innocent immigrants locked in prisons which is not being humane. Works Cited list Moghadam, V.M. Globalizing women: Transnational feminist networks. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press. 2005 Support our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhood Act. Arizona State

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Why We Should Fight the War on Terrorism Free Essays

string(381) " Enhance measures to ensure the integrity, reliability, and availability of critical physical and information-based infrastructures at home and abroad \? Integrate measures to protect US citizens abroad \? Ensure an integrated incident management capability Campaigns of the War on Terror A common misconception the American public makes is that the War on Terror is only in Iraq\." â€Å"Common Sense† A Rationale for the War on Terrorism Preface On September 11, 2001, our fellow citizens, our way of life, our very freedom came under attack in a series of deliberate and deadly terrorist acts. On this day, our nation united, determined to obliterate the evil force of terrorism from the planet Earth. Now, just eight years later, these same people wish to pardon the acts of evil, disregarding the 2,995 deaths that they united to avenge just a few years before. We will write a custom essay sample on Why We Should Fight the War on Terrorism or any similar topic only for you Order Now So the question lies before us; do we hunt down and punish those responsible for these cowardly acts, or do we ignorantly allow terrorist to revenge the freedoms our founding fathers worked so hard for? Because of the threat caused by terrorist on the United States of America, her citizens should continue to thwart the terrorists’ threats both at home and abroad. Some may wonder why the United States should continue fighting the War on Terror. It must be fought for the safety for our citizens, insurance of our posterity, and preservation of liberty. The ignorance of the American public must not destroy the future of a country that was founded on freedom. The America we live in is a country that has endured much. Ever since the Revolutionary War, our ancestors have defended this country with all their might, so that their descendants may reach the dream we like to call â€Å"The American Dream†. Now it is our turn. The veterans of World War Two fought to defend our country after the attack on Pearl Harbor. Are their sacrifices not made for the same reasons as troops’ today- defending the United States of America? It will take America united to win the war, not just the republicans or democrats. Public Perception of the War In the past century, the American public has become more increasingly active in their government than ever before. In some cases, such as the Watergate Scandal, this is a good thing. In some cases, it isn’t. People never want to admit they are wrong, so therefore they give their opinions on topics they haven’t the slightest knowledge about. The founding fathers foresaw this, and created the Electoral College in attempt to prevent it. The founding fathers did overlook the fact that the peoples’ ignorance could span further than presidential elections. The people of America will never abstain from making a decision, uninformed or not. The people show a lack of understanding of the War on Terror, yet still protest it. They see it as a conspiracy, or an attempt to rejuvenate American Imperialism. They are blind to the fact that every war this country has fought was caused by aggravation of another state. They fail to realize terrorism as the state that can destroy our way of life if not dealt with. The War on Terror is in no way, shape, or form a takeover; it is liberation. It is a liberation years in the making, but starting only now. Foreshadowing the War One thing people tend unable to grasp is that the United States has faced multiple terrorist acts carried out by al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda became active in 1992 with the coordinated bombings of two hotels in Aden, Yemen. Since then it has expanded greatly. It was responsible for the 1993 bombings of the World Trade Center and attacks on U. S. troops in Mogadishu. It was also responsible for the 1995 bombing of the National Guard Training Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia. Al-Qaeda was directly involved in coordinating the 1998 United States embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania, along with the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole in Yemen, and the September 11 attacks. Actions were taken to search for Osama bin Laden (the leader of al-Qaeda) during the Clinton presidency, but were never a priority. So why attack the U. S.? Al-Qaeda’s ideology includes â€Å"ridding the Muslim world of any non-Muslim influences. † On February 23, 1998, Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri, a leader of Egyptian Islamic Jihad, along with three other Islamist leaders, co-signed and issued a fatwa (binding religious edict) calling on Muslims to kill Americans and their allies where they can, when they can. Neither bin Laden nor al-Zawahiri met the traditional qualifications to issue a fatwa of any kind, but their hatred of the United States led them to do so anyway. Before the launch of the War on Terror, al-Qaeda had already killed 3,036 Americans, injured 11,870+ Americans, and cost the United States over $32. 1 billion. The attacks foreshadowing the War on Terror were clearly costly to the United States, and are motifs for fighting the al-Qaeda and other terrorist organizations today. The War Begins The War on Terror began on October 7, 2001. In the words of former president George W. Bush, â€Å"Our war on terror begins with al-Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated. President Bush outlined the following as objectives for the War on Terror: ? Defeat terrorists such as Osama Bin Laden, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and destroy their organizations ? Identify, locate and destroy terrorists along with their organizations ? Deny sponsorship, support and sanctuary to terrorists ? End the state sponsorship of terrorism ? Establish and maintain an international stand ard of accountability with regard to combating terrorism ? Strengthen and sustain the international effort to fight terrorism ? Work with willing and able states ? Enable weak states ? Persuade reluctant states ? Compel unwilling states ? Interdict and disrupt material support for terrorists ? Eliminate terrorist sanctuaries and havens ? Diminish the underlying conditions that terrorists seek to exploit ? Partner with the international community to strengthen weak states and prevent (re)emergence of terrorism ? Win the war of ideals ? Defend US citizens and interests at home and abroad ? Implement the National Strategy for Homeland Security ? Attain domain awareness Enhance measures to ensure the integrity, reliability, and availability of critical physical and information-based infrastructures at home and abroad ? Integrate measures to protect US citizens abroad ? Ensure an integrated incident management capability Campaigns of the War on Terror A common misconception the American public makes is that the War on Terror is only in Iraq. You read "Why We Should Fight the War on Terrorism" in category "Papers" Former President Bush clearly defined that the War on Terror does not end until we destroy all terrorist groups of global reach and prevent their re-emergence. The War on Terror is currently being fought in Iraq, Afghanistan, The Philippines, The Horn of Africa, The Mediterranean, Maghreb, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Thailand, Somalia, Israel, Lebanon, Gaza Strip, Nigeria, and North Caucasus (among others). Every campaign of the War on Terror is vital to achieve the war’s objectives. Operation Enduring Freedom The term â€Å"OEF† typically refers to the war in Afghanistan. Some operations are only loosely or nominally connected to OEF. All the operations, however, have a focus on counterterrorism activities. The operations included in OEF are all crucial to the global uproot of terrorist. These operations also are vital to the accomplishment of the objectives outlined for the War on Terror. OEF comprises several subordinate operations: ? Operation Enduring Freedom – Afghanistan Iraq (OEF-A) ? The Goals of OEF-A are simply to remove the Taliban regime in Afghanistan, and destroy al-Qaeda’s presence their. On October 7, 2001, American and British forces began aerial bombings campaigns targeting al-Qaeda and Taliban force. After the last Taliban-held city in the north was captured, most of the Taliban of the north retreated to Pakistan. The Taliban regime of Afghanistan was removed on November, 2001. In December, 2001, U. S. , British, and Northern Alliance forces united to further destroy Taliban and al-Qaeda in The Battle of Tora Bora. On March 1, 2002, Operation Anaconda, an operation intended to destroy Taliban and al-Qaeda in the area, began and lasted until March 18th. It was largely successful, with American troops killing over half of the 1,000 fighters. Since then, operations to removing the growing Taliban insurgency have occurred. The Taliban still holds influence in many regions, and needs to be destroyed in order to prevent another regime. OEF-A is probably the most active subordinate operation contained in OEF. People tend to take for granted that without more troops operating here, the insurgency could grow faster than it can be removed. The problem with this is once the insurgency is la rge enough, the Taliban could regain control. Afterwards, the Taliban, angry at the United States, would sponsor al-Qaeda more than ever. Catastrophic events, such as a larger magnitude duplicate of the September 11th attacks, could result. Operation Enduring Freedom – Philippines (OEF-P) ? In January, 2002, 1,200 members of United States Special Operations Command, Pacific (SOCPAC) were deployed to the Philippines to assist the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) in removing the al-Qaeda, Jemaah Islamiyah and Abu Sayyaf terrorist organizations from the islands. The operations were successful, and OEF-P is expected to end in 2010. ? To some, the correlation between OEF-P and the War on Terror are unclear. This, like OEF-A, helps accomplish several of the objectives for the war. Even if we destroy al-Qaeda in every other part of the world, if we don’t remove it from the Philippines it could reform. Al-Qaeda can be compared to a cancer. If not completely removed, it can regenerate worse than ever. ? Operation Enduring Freedom – Horn of Africa (OEF-HOA) ? Anti piracy operations were undertaken by the coalition throughout 2006 through a battle fought in March that was caused by U. S. ships being attacked by pirates. In January 2007, during the war in Somalia, an airstrike was conducted against al-Qaeda members embedded with forces of the Islamic Courts Union (ICU) operating in southern Somalia. US naval forces were positioned off the coast of Somalia to provide support and to prevent any al-Qaeda forces escaping by sea. Actions against pirates also occurred in June and October 2007 with varying amounts of success. ? OEF-HOA may not be as important as the other subordinate operations, but it is still important. Piracy has plagued the world long before the formation of the United States. Following the 2006 piracy events, the United States felt it necessary to fight piracy as a form of terrorism. This was reinforced after the recent Somali piracy attacks. ? Operation Enduring Freedom – Trans Sahara (OEF-TS) OEF-TS is an operation conducted by the United States and partner nations in the Sahara/Sahel region of Africa, consisting of counterterrorism efforts and policing of arms and drug trafficking across central Africa. Congress approved $500 million for the Trans-Saharan Counterterrorism Initiative (TSCTI) over six years to support countries involved in counterterrorism against alleged threats of Al Qaeda operating in African countries, primarily Algeria, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Senegal, Nigeria, and Morocco. ? OEF-TS is fought for all the same reasons as OEF-P. If al-Qaeda reforms after its destruction, the United States would face catastrophic events. ? Operation Enduring Freedom – Kyrgyzstan (completed in 2004) ? Kyrgyzstan was basically an operation to clear out al-Qaeda forces so that Operation Enduring Freedom Allies could use Kyrgyzstan as a base in central Asia. Operation Active Endeavor Operation Active Endeavour is a naval operation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). It operates in the Mediterranean Sea and is designed to prevent the movement of terrorists or weapons of mass destruction as well as to enhance the security of shipping in general. Operation Iraqi Freedom Operation Iraqi Freedom is an ongoing military campaign which began on March 20, 2003 with the invasion of Iraq by a coalition, led by troops from the United States and the United Kingdom. Prior to the operation, the governments of the United States and the United Kingdom claimed that Iraq’s alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) posed an imminent threat to their security and that of their coalition allies. The invasion of Iraq led to an occupation and the eventual capture of President Hussein, who was later executed by the new Iraqi government. Violence against coalition forces and among various sectarian groups soon led to the Iraqi insurgency, strife between many Sunni and Shia Iraqi groups, and al-Qaeda operations in Iraq. In late February 2009, President Barack Obama announced an 18-month withdrawal window for combat forces, leaving behind 30,000 to 50,000 troops to advise and train Iraqi security forces and to provide intelligence and surveillance. General Ray Odierno, the top US military commander in Iraq, said he believes all US troops will be out of the country by the end of 2012, while British forces ended combat operations on April 30, 2009. Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has said he supports the accelerated pullout of US forces. Arguments for Fighting the War on Terror After being briefed on the War on Terror, one could assume that the majority of the American public would support the war. Americans, out of ignorance, choose to protest that in which they know nothing about. There are several benefits for continuation of the War on Terror, and many consequences for a sudden withdraw. Homeland Security Following the terrorist attacks of September 11th, protection of the country from further attacks was among the highest priorities. Acts, such as creation of the United States Department of Homeland Security and USA PATRIOT Act, strengthened the nation greatly. To date, no attacks by Islamic terrorists on the US homeland have been successful since September 11, 2001 (although several were attempted). At times we take for granted the fact that our actions against terrorism since September 11th have decreased the likeliness of another attack. If the United States withdraws its armed forces from the War on Terror, organizations such as al-Qaeda can rebuild and prepare a counter-attack. You pose a very important question that will impact future American generations. Sarcastically, I could say that we shouldn’t open any new battle fronts against terrorism or terrorists. We should, as the Democrats, appear to invite, tuck our tails and withdraw from every foreign soil where America is trying to thwart terrorism. Then, let’s wait until they conduct suicide bombing attacks on our soil killing innocent men, women and babies, as they attend a movie. But if we wait, it’ll be too late to do what we are doing now — take the fight to them, and have it in their backyard, not ours. — DeWane (a FOX News Fan) International Influence The United States of America has only lost two of the nineteen wars/invasions it has fought. This means the U. S. A. ’s military success rate is at 90%. With this high success rate, it can use military force as a threat towards nations/organizations that oppose it. If the United States decides to withdraw from the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, then its success rate will fall to 81%. This leads to other countries thinking that our threats of military action aren’t serious. Conclusion The War on Terrorism is a war needing fought. People, regardless of ethnicity, political party, or even nationality, need to unite once more. The people of the United States of America, nay the people of the planet Earth, need to unite to destroy these terrorist groups that plague the world in which we inhabit. In the words of the current president of the United States, Barrack Obama, â€Å"We are in the early stages of a long struggle. Yet since 9/11, we’ve heard a lot about what America can’t do or shouldn’t do or won’t even try. We can’t reach out to the hundreds of millions of Muslims who reject terror because we worry they hate us. We can’t protect the homeland because there are too many targets, or secure our people while staying true to our values. We can’t get past the America of Red and Blue, the politics of who’s up and who’s down. That is not the America that I know. The America I know is the last, best hope for that child looking up at a helicopter. It’s the country that put a man on the moon; that defeated fascism and helped rebuild Europe. It’s a country whose strength abroad is measured not just by armies, but rather by the power of our ideals, and by our purpose to forge an ever more perfect union at home. That’s the America I know. We just have to act like it again to write that next chapter in the American story. If we do, we can keep America safe while extending security and opportunity around the world. We can hold true to our values, and in doing so advance those values abroad. And we can be what that child looking up at a helicopter needs us to be: the relentless opponent of terror and tyranny, and the light of hope to the world. To make this story reality, it’s going to take Americans coming together and changing the fundamental direction of this country. It’s going to take the service of a new generation of young people. It’s going to take facing tragedy head-on and turning it into the next generation’s triumph. That is a challenge that I welcome. Because when we do make that change, we’ll do more than win a war — we’ll live up to that calling to make America, and the world, safer, freer, and more hopeful than we found it. † â€Å"America was not built on fear. America was built on courage, on imagination and an unbeatable determination to do the job at hand. †-Harry S. Truman How to cite Why We Should Fight the War on Terrorism, Essays

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Foundations of Bible Based Christ Worldview for Holy Trinity

Question: Write about theFoundations of Bible Based Christ Worldview for Holy Trinity. Answer: Description The main topic of description in this book is the fact how much the God loves the human beings. It is a known thing that the human beings are considered as the children of God and God created them in His own image. In this context, it can be said that the God is the father of all the human beings. Therefore, he has to play the role of a proper father as he takes care of all the children and protects them from all the evils. God is considered to be a part of the Holy Trinity in the Christianity (Noble, 2013). The book talks about the great painting of Stedelijk Museum that is titled as Man, but it is to be countered that the original name of the painting of Karel Apples work was My Father. Generally, the human beings see God as a loving father and bestow utmost love and respect for Him. It is believed by the human beings that the God is an impersonal being who is very hard to be seen or known by a human being personally (Bass, 2012). Sunday is considered to be the day for the mass prayer of God in the churches and everyone prays to Him seriously for their well-being and the peace in the entire world. In this book a new point has been added to look at the God. Most of the people desire to build a strong relationship with Him but it all goes in vain as He cannot be seen by the human beings (Borg Wright, 2014). This book tells that the God has created in His image but in a smaller scale than His. The message of God is love all the fellow human beings but not to hate them and engage them in hating and killing each other. The earth is the creation of the God and He sent the human beings into earth to protect His creation (Milne, 2012). The true father of human beings God had sent the human beings to spread love and respect all over but the selfishness of the human beings has prevented the human beings from being that kind of beings. God has always cared for the human beings and gave them all sorts of freedom that they can expect. The selfishness is an evil that has restricted the human beings from doing the common good for the human society (Kastenbaum, 2015). The book depicts the things why the people in this world always fall into sins. However, this book is not properly addressed to sexuality but discusses the fact that human beings have to manage themselves before conducting anything. After reading this book, it can be said that God is very much affectionate for the human beings since as well as His Son, Jesus Christ (Kasper, 2012). One of the most reasons for the committing of sin is the grief among the human beings. The author has again and again put focus on the sorrows of the human beings and said that these sorrows can be easily healed by God (Noble, 2013). Analysis In this purpose, the purpose is to analyze the different themes of the book. The main things that the book deals with are the sinfulness of the human beings and the healing power of the God. It has been believed that the emotional wounds that the children suffer in their childhood. This becomes a big barrier for them in order to understand the power of God and His benevolence (Johnson, 2015). He indeed takes care of all His children but some have experienced the contrary things. This has become a hollow place in their lives. In the times of remembering God, many people call Him to be the God but some people hesitate to call Him so because He is invisible and those human beings cannot see Him. This would be very much embarrassing for the human beings because they feel uncomfortable for the human beings to call someone father whom they even cannot see (Johnson, 2015). In Bible, it has been depicted and said that God has given the human beings the power to call the people to be His children who have believed in Him and believed that He has all the powers to control the activities of the human beings (Fee Stuart, 2014). The children of God must believe that Jesus came into this earth as the son of God and he was crucified by the betrayers and then he was resurrected. This incident proves that Jesus was resurrected to free the mankind of their sins. The broken spirit of the human beings has resisted themselves from fully believing the existence of God. Any person who has been brought up in his home and family as a forgotten one and the most ignored one, gets a feeling that he is no longer needed in this world. Thus he also believes that no good can be done to him in this context. So, he becomes desolate and tries to find the way to escape from this earthly creation of God (Edwards, 2014). Then comes the turn of God to save him from this static condi tion and give him a proper life to lead and escape from life is not a proper way to end the miseries. A person who has been tortured by his or her father from childhood starts to become afraid of the father and does not respond to the father in a proper way. This is where the emotional wounds or the broken spirit comes into play. The stories of Michal, David and others have revealed the fact that the human beings must not be engaged in committing selfish acts just because they had been victims of the same. Jesus has described the God to be merciful, compassionate, kind, forgiving and a loving father (Talbott, 2014). This is why God never disappoints any of His followers; rather he embraces each of them by forgiving their sins and led them to the way of salvation (Parton, 2015). Jesus was believed to be God in the form of a human being. The story that is narrated in the book about the Jewish children, whose mothers wanted that Jesus should bless their children, puts forth the belief that Jesus has always taken care of His children, either invisibly or in the form of a human being as w ell. Personal reflection In this segment, I would like to venture my points of view about the topic of the book. As the topic of the book goes about the relevance of God as a loving father, I must say that God exists and He takes care of all His children in a positive way. He may take tests of patience and endurance of His followers and He wants to see how they behave in the cases of complexity. I think this will be very much justified for the followers of God to pass through this endurance test. I have read the book thoroughly enough to understand that the God is very much benevolent and looks after all the miseries of the human beings and tries to solve them. His aim is to drive the activities of the human beings in such a way that they can attain salvation. Jesus was believed to be the God himself as well as the Son of God. The incidents that he came up with prove that his heart was filled with pity and compassion. As the Jewish people hated the Samaritans, Jesus spoke to a Jewish woman who was thought to be the despicable person. I think through this act of kindness, God sent his message that He cares for every human being. I have also read examples from the Bible where Jesus has spread His love throughout the world. This works as the evidence for the God to shower His blessings and sympathy for all of the human beings in the same manner. The treatment of Jesus to the Samaritan woman has reflected us the way in which we never thought of seeing God. The benevolence of God has been reflected in the way god has been represented in this story. I believe God has kept some positive things for each and everyone in this world. Those positive points have to be found out by committing good deeds and not committing any sins. The sinfulness of the human beings leads them towards damnation. The human beings have to do the best things by the virtue of which they will be relieved of their sins. They must get rid of their evil intentions in real time and get indulged in doing well for the entire humanity. I think the human beings begin their lives as the little children who are entirely dependent on the others. This dependence shoves away slowly as they get matured and get adults. I believe that God designed the lives of the human beings in a way that the little children should grow up and feel the love of their fathers. This fact will be reflected as they begin to blessings of love from God by getting good results in the works they undertake. I should conclude this paper by saying that God is benevolent and takes care of all His children. References Bass, D. B. (2012). Christianity After Religion.San Francisco. Borg, M. J., Wright, N. T. (2014).The Meaning of Jesus. HarperCollins e-Books. Edwards, D. (2014).Breath of life: A theology of the Creator Spirit. Orbis Books. Fee, G. D., Stuart, D. (2014).How to read the Bible for all its worth. Zondervan. Johnson, E. A. (2015).Abounding in Kindness: Writings for the People of God. Orbis Books. Kasper, W. (2012).The God of Jesus Christ: New Edition. Bloomsbury Publishing. Kastenbaum, R. (2015).Death, society, and human experience. Routledge. McClung, F. (2004).The father heart of God. Harvest House Publishers. Milne, B. (2012).Know the truth: A handbook of Christian belief. intervarsity press. Noble, T. A. (2013).Holy Trinity: Holy people: the theology of Christian perfecting. Wipf and Stock Publishers. Parton, K. (2015).Salvation Damnation. Lulu. com. Reynolds, N. (2015). Discourses of love, compassion, and belonging: Reframing Christianity for a secular audience.Journal of Contemporary Religion,30(1), 39-54. Talbott, T. (2014).The Inescapable Love of God. Wipf and Stock Publishers.